HomeThe Hidden Cost of Connectivity: A Budgetary Comparison of DAS vs. WAVETHRUBusiness CaseThe Hidden Cost of Connectivity: A Budgetary Comparison of DAS vs. WAVETHRU

The Hidden Cost of Connectivity: A Budgetary Comparison of DAS vs. WAVETHRU

The Hidden Cost of Connectivity: A Budgetary Comparison of DAS vs. WAVETHRU

Architects architects meeting

Mobile connectivity is no longer a luxury, but a necessity for the productivity and satisfaction of occupants in any modern building. However, ensuring perfect coverage comes at a cost, and it is often much higher than the initial investment alone. Between heavy active infrastructures like DAS (Distributed Antenna Systems) and innovative passive technologies like WAVETHRU, the long-term budgetary implications are radically different. Let’s analyze the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) to make an informed choice.

1. CAPEX: The Initial Investment, a First Major Gap 

The initial investment (CAPEX) is the first point of comparison.

  • A multi-operator DAS system is a complete infrastructure. It requires complex radio studies, agreements with operators, technical bays, amplifiers, kilometers of cables, and antennas. For a 10,000 m² building, the investment typically ranges between €160,000 and €330,000.
  • WAVETHRU technology, on the other hand, does not create a network but makes the building’s glazing permeable to existing waves. After a radio audit, the treatment is applied by laser directly on-site. The investment is 3 to 5 times cheaper, ranging between €65,000 and €135,000.

2. OPEX: The Recurring Costs That Make All the Difference 

It is with the operating expenses (OPEX) that the gap widens spectacularly over 10 years.

  • DAS system is energy-intensive. It consumes between 1 and 3 kW continuously, resulting in an annual energy bill of €2,000 to €6,000. Furthermore, it requires mandatory annual maintenance (updates, checks) costing between €5,000 and €12,000 per year. Over 10 years, the OPEX for a DAS can reach €70,000 to €180,000.
  • WAVETHRU is a passive solution. Once the treatment is applied, there is no equipment to power and no parts to maintain. The OPEX is therefore €0.

3. Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) over 10 years: The Ultimate Benchmark 

By adding up CAPEX and OPEX over a decade, the result is undeniable for a 10,000 m² building:

  • Total DAS Cost: €230,000 – €510,000
  • Total WAVETHRU Cost: €65,000 – €135,000

Calculated per square meter, WAVETHRU represents a cost of €6.5 to €13/m² over 10 years, compared to €23 to €51/m² for a DAS. Beyond the substantial savings, choosing a passive solution means opting for simplicity, budget predictability, and enhancing the value of your asset without the burden of operating expenses. It is a strategic choice that drastically reduces the real estate budget while providing a sustainable and effective solution.

AGC Glass Europe, a European leader in flat glass

Based in Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium), AGC Glass Europe produces, processes and markets flat glass for the construction sector (external glazing and interior decoration), the automotive industry and other industrial sectors (transport, solar power and high tech). It is the European branch of AGC, a world leader in flat glass, with over 100 sites throughout Europe and 15,200 employees. For more information, visit www.agc-yourglass.com.

Powered by AGC®

WAVE by AGC delivers a range of innovative telecom solutions delivering not only better connectivity outdoors in urban environments, but also indoors using WAVETHRU. For more information, visit www.wavebyagc.com.

Simply connected through glazing.

12 Louis Blériot street
6041 Gosselies, Belgium

2026 WAVE by AGC